A Report That Examines The Role Of Expert And Lay Knowledge In Understanding And Managing Risk

This report is going to break d avouch how gambles we face in our daily lives rely on different forms of experience to create an cause of them and their consequences. This report impart see how mess use nice and prepargon knowledge more or less fortunes in order to live with them. A design description of risk is provided. The discussion focuses on how we live with risk and symbolize good and lay knowledge regarding risk and risk avoidance. It is also suggested that mess get their own choice as to what and how they use information and to what detail of risk they consider acceptable in their lives. This is influenced by the knowledge they nominate and how they interpret that. Clearly an technical will be in a stronger position to accurately assess risk comp bed to a lay person.1. talented Knowledge some single that has knowledge, skill and is qualified in a particular proposition subject.2. Lay Knowledge someone who does not take on specialized knowledge or train ing in a subject.This report will examine three examples of risk and will detail not only sharp information but it will review lay opinion as well.1. Firstly the cycling and the benefits of wearing helmet will be assessed.2. Then a case excogitate that detailed an allotment and the hazardous substances found in the grease.3. The last risk to be observed will be cheerfulness exposure, sunlightshine flagellation and risks and how consumerism john play apart in forming our choices.1. Our doubtful Lives1. Risk a state in which there is a gap of known danger or equipment casualty, which if avoided whitethorn lead to benefits (Carter and Jordan, 2009).Almost everything we do in life comes with some degree of risk. It is how we interpret the risk that obtains how we live. nigh risk is taken without thinking, some risk is unavoidable, and in other cases we groundwork reduce the risk or avoid the risk all together.1. make pass and the benefits of wearing a helmetCycling will i ntroduce the idea of risks and risk management in our solid lives. Cyclists manage their risk with lights, occasional hit signals and helmets. Cyclists have to negotiate the use of the helmet, whether or not to wear one but not doing so means any defect simple machinery on may be the cyclists own fault. One study shown 85 per cent reduction in the risk of head injury among cyclists who wore helmets (Thompson et al., cited in Carter and Jordan, 2009). Other re hunt club found that, when car overtakes a cyclist, the car comes significantly closer to a cyclist who wears a helmet (Walker, cited in Carter and Jordan, 2009). pickings both studies into account seems to suggest that if you wear a helmet then you are more likely to have an adventure but if you have an accident then you are less likely to have head injuries.1. violent substances found in the soilSoil on an allotment will show how knowledge of an inconspicuous risk is produced by experts but can be contested and how th e allotment users used knowledge to manage the risks. The benefits of a social activity such as gardening were suddenly brought into research by publication of a scientific test on the soil. The stuff environment changed from being good into something that was dangerous. The soil was proficient then became noisome and then become safe again, all without the soil itself being changed.The conception of two soil tests confirms that even within science there are debates over how best to assess risk. In the case study, the same soil shifted from being safe to dangerous and back again solely as a result of different measurement practices (Carter and Jordan, 2009). This shows how the expert knowledge may or may not influence the decisions sight make about managing risk. Gardener did not listen to expert knowledge about safe soil, because two contrasting results of the tests did not feel quite trustworthy.1. Sun painting and expert knowledge of sun riskThe last risk to be assessed wi ll be sun exposure and sun tanning and risks. increasingly over the last number of geezerhood dangers of sun exposure and tanning have come to the fore. Even though advice and evidence which has been produced people so far continue to expose themselves to the harmful UVA rays. In this section we can tonus at a second case study of risk and risk management concerning holidaymakers and their attitudes to a tan. To understand the apparently risky practices connected with sun exposure we have to take seriously the ways in which people make sense of expert advice, and measure it against their own knowledge and experiences of the visible world in which they live (Carter and Jordan, 2009).The research conducted by Simon Carter used a mixture of interviews and focus groups with tourist aged 20 and 35 years of age who regularly travelled abroad for holidays. The first thing that this search found was that people could recall health education advice by pursuit shade, victimisation a sun screen or covering the body. People knew what the expert advice said about the dangers of sun.However, people did not fully follow this advice because they had their own ways of understanding and making sense of the healthy and risky elements of their substantive lives. The knowledge produced by experts was different from that produced by holidaymakers. This distinction between expert and lay knowledge meant that expert knowledge was interpreted rather than followed to the garner by the public (Carter and Jordan, 2009). The expert knowledge does not straightforwardly contain public opinion.1. Lay knowledge of symbolic riskThe effects that the sun has on the body are both a source of stuff and nonsense risk, from cancers, and of symbolic risk, such as being peely-wally (Carter and Jordan, 2009). Suntan became a material sign or symbol that is for the visual consumption of other tourists.1. Becks thesis. The examples of sun exposure and of poisoned soil demonstrate how we may have entered into a particular kind of relationship to risk in participation today.German sociologist Ulrich Beck examined the move from the Industrial Society in which political deliberations where concerns with the distribution of wealth to a Risk Society that focuses on the distribution of harm (cited in Carter and Jordan, 2009 p. 80). Beck also arguesthat we have become dependent on outdoor(a) information usually expert knowledge to assess the risks we face, instead of using personal experience or common sense. For example, the allotment holders could not determine the risks contained in their soil, they were told about potential danger by scientific experts. Similarly, the accomplishable risk from sun exposure has to be made clear to people by expert evidence. One of Becks main concerns is the role of expert knowledge in defining the risks, whether that risk is nuclear radiation, arsenic in the soil or the sun.1. ConclusionIn modern society untold more effort is being put into measuring risk. Experts aim to examine potential hazards and produce evidence that will allow us to make informed decisions. Assessing risk often relies on science and expertise. These are practices which imply choices and assumptions that can create debate.A risk society is one in which calculations of risk become increasingly prominent.Many modern risks are invisible and need experts to make them visible to the public.