The Use of Force by Police, Specific Cases and their Implications Research Paper

The Use of Force by Police, Specific Cases and their Implications - Research Paper ExampleForce is apply by the jurisprudence to overcome resistance to their authority and to protect both civilians and ships officers. It is necessary that they have this tycoon in order for them to carry out their function, and the go for of reasonable force is legal. However, the subject is one of large contention, in regards to both non-deadly and deadly force. The use of force is often connected with racism, with significant concern by civilians that many instances where force is used are the result of racial profiling. There is rising debate approximately whether the police overstep their boundaries in the use of force, using force when it is not necessary, and in order to dun or suppress civilians that are involved in undesirable, barely not illegal actions. Examples of this include use of police force on civilians during peaceful protests, and using excessive force on particular races b ut not others. This had lead to concerns that control surrounding the use of force in the police is severely lacking. The personal manner in which police use force is varied and depends on the circumstance, the individuals involved and the agency in which the officer is from. The most basic form of force involves the use of handcuffs. Other non-lethal forms of force include the use of semiconducting energy devices (CEDs) such as tasers, and of aerosol sprays such as Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) spray, also known as pepper spray (MacDonald et al., 2009). . Firearms are also used, although the rate at which they are discharged is low, with one body of work estimating at in 0.6% of incidents a firearm was discharged . There are no national laws or regulations that control the use of firearms within the police, and as a consequence, policies take issue between cities and states. The rules and directives concerning the use of force differ between agencies. Within the United States, 45% of local and state law enforcement agencies have been found to abandon the use of OC spray, and 20-30% allow the use of CEDs to bypass passive resistance . Likewise, different agencies and states have different run through procedures for the use of force. The amount of force used by police has been found to differ significantly depending on the authority of the police officer. Detectives were found to be considerably more forceful than patrol officers under the homogeneous types of situations . Concern for the use of force by the police is partially connected to the lack of discipline for police officers that use force that is greater than the situation requires, even when the force that was used was clearly indefensible. In the display case of the use of lethal force through firearms, following incidents it is often unclear whether the force used was inordinate or justify. As the cases are reviewed by the police, there are few cases where the use of force is considered unjustif ied and as a consequence there are few criminal charges laid . The definition of justified force that is used by the police in these investigations does not always match this